Why are Israel and Palestine fighting?

In order to understand why this is happening, we need to first comprehend where this is all stemming from. This will be best explained if we are able to take a quick history lesson on the subject.

Historical Background

The land known today as Israel and the Palestinian territories has been inhabited by various peoples throughout history, including the ancient Israelites and Philistines.

By the late 19th century, it was part of the Ottoman Empire, and this area was predominantly Arab and Muslim, with a small Jewish minority.

The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw the rise of Zionism, a movement among Jews to establish a national homeland in what was then Palestine. This led to increased Jewish immigration to the area, especially as Jews fled persecution in Europe.

After World War I, the League of Nations awarded Britain the mandate to govern Palestine. The Balfour Declaration of 1917, issued by Britain, supported the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine but also called for protecting the rights of the existing non-Jewish communities. Tensions between Jewish and Arab communities grew over land and political rights.

In 1947, the United Nations proposed partitioning Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem as an international city. The plan was accepted by Jewish leaders but rejected by Arab leaders.

In 1948, Israel declared independence the moment that the British mandate ended, leading to the first Arab-Israeli war. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were expelled from their homes in what became Israel, creating a major refugee crisis and territorial disputes.

Results of that war:

  • Israeli victory
  • Partial Jordanian victory
  • Palestinian Arab, Egyptian, and Syrian defeat
  • Isreal gets to keep the land alloted by the partition plan that was set forth by the United Nations and captures the majority of the land allotted to the Arab state.
  • Jordanian’s rule the west bank and Egyptians occupy the Gaza Strip.

There have been several wars and many efforts at peace since this event in 1948, including the 1967 Six-Day War, where Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, territories that Palestinians claim for a future state.

Despite various peace processes, including the Oslo Accords in 1993, significant disagreements remain over key issues such as borders, the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and Palestinian refugees’ right of return.

Today, the conflict between these two groups has continued to take a rocky path forward, especially since the recent attack on Oct 7th, 2023.

Current Status

Since the Oct 7th attack, there has been serious turmoil between both parties. Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist group that was responsible for this attack immediately retreated back behind the walls of the Gaza strip and went into hiding.

They have also taken fortified positions and have networks of tunnels all over the Gaza strip they continue to utilize.

It appears that Hamas have been involving a large amount of civilians in the conflict by using many people as human shields when fighting the Israelis.

Unfortunately Israelis have also had their share of Palestinian civilian casualties, especially from their coordinated air attacks.

Results of Oct 7th attack:

  • 1,609 Hamas Militants Killed – 200 captured
  • 1,143 Israelis killed (376 security forces, 767 civilians, 36 children)
  • 3,400 Israeli civilians and soldiers wounded
  • 247 Israeli civilians and soldiers taken captive

As many as 44 countries identified this attack as an act of terrorism, although some Arab and Muslim countries claim that it was Israel’s occupation of their own Palestinian territories that was the main cause.

As it stands, Israeli forces have clearly shown the upper hand and have driven Hamas, along with about one million Palestinians into the Rafah (the bottom left corner of Gaza strip that shares a border with Egypt).

President Biden has made it clear recently that he is on the same page with Netanyahu and is committed to help defeat Hamas entirely.

He is urging Netanyahu to allow most of these Palestinian refugees to get out while they still can, but Netanyahu wants to proceed regardless.

“Look, it’s either Israel or Hamas. There is no middle way,” Netanyahu said. “We can’t leave a quarter of the Hamas terror army in place. They’re there in Rafah. This would be equivalent to saying, you know, after the Allies fought back, gone through Normandy, went through Germany, and you’d say, well, we’ll leave a quarter of the Nazi army in place and we won’t go into Berlin, the last stronghold.”

Netanyahu also seems to have the full backing of the Israeli people. Unfortunately peace talks have mostly failed and it appears inevitable that Israeli forces will be going in soon.

Joe Biden & Border Security.

Introduction

The United States is currently facing a significant border crisis, characterized by an unprecedented surge in migrants arriving at its southern border.

What’s more, is that the current administration seems to not give a rat’s ass to get things under control.  At this time, we can only assume that they are deliberately opening the flood gates to let illegal immigrants into our country.

The question is……. why?

This situation has not only strained the resources and infrastructure designed to manage border crossings but has also intensified the political debate around immigration policies and border security.

The crisis presents complex humanitarian, logistical, and political challenges, reflecting broader issues of global inequality and political instability.

This blog post aims to shed light on the current border crisis, exploring its causes, challenges, and the search for viable solutions.

If this situation isn’t resolved quickly, I fear that there be grave long-term consequences for the United States and its tax-paying citizens.

Background and Context

For decades, the U.S. has been a focal point for migrants and asylum seekers from around the world, drawn by the promise of safety, opportunity, and a better life.

I still believe that this assertion holds true today.  America is the greatest nation in the world – for now.

The dynamics of migration to the U.S., particularly across the southern border, have been influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including economic disparities, violence, and the political instability in other countries that drove its citizens to flee for a better life.

Recent years have seen a notable increase in the number of families and unaccompanied minors attempting to cross the border, many fleeing dire conditions in Central America and beyond.

This surge has overwhelmed existing border management and immigration processing systems, leading to a situation often described as a crisis.

The roots of this crisis are deep and multifaceted. Economic inequality, lack of access to education, job opportunities, and basic services, coupled with violence and persecution in home countries, drive many to embark on the perilous journey to the U.S.

Additionally, climate change (No, not manmade climate change) has begun to exacerbate these push factors, with natural disasters and changing weather patterns disrupting livelihoods, especially in agriculturally dependent regions.

Incorporating the role of the current administration’s policies and their negative impact on the flow of migrants is crucial to presenting a comprehensive view of the situation.

Current Challenges

The U.S. border crisis is marked by several immediate and long-term challenges.

Logistically, the surge in arrivals has put unprecedented pressure on border processing facilities, many of which are ill-equipped to handle the volume or the specific needs of vulnerable populations, such as unaccompanied minors.

Humanitarian challenges are also significant, with reports of overcrowded conditions and limited access to basic services, raising serious concerns about the wellbeing of migrants.

Politically, the crisis has become a focal point of intense debate, reflecting broader divisions within the U.S. regarding immigration policy.

Local communities near the border find themselves on the front lines, grappling with the immediate impacts of increased arrivals, from stretched resources to humanitarian outreach efforts.

The state of Texas has recently taken it upon itself to secure its own borders since they are getting railroaded by the federal government.

Humanitarian Concerns

The conditions faced by migrants at the U.S. border and in detention facilities have drawn international attention and criticism. Reports of overcrowding, limited access to healthcare, and prolonged detention times highlight the human cost of the crisis.

Humanitarian organizations and advocacy groups have called for immediate improvements to conditions, emphasizing the need for a more compassionate and comprehensive approach to migration management.

Ironically, this is the result of many of these activist and vocal groups own political policies. 

For example, Joe Biden ended the “remain in Mexico” policy, which was put into law by former president Donald Trump in 2019.  This policy required asylum seekers arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border to stay in Mexico while their immigration cases were processed in U.S. courts.

The policy aimed to deter fraudulent asylum claims and reduce the strain on U.S. immigration resources by preventing asylum seekers from staying in the U.S. during the adjudication process.

Policy Responses and Political Debate

In response to the surge in migrant arrivals, the current U.S. administration has faced criticism and scrutiny over its border management and immigration policies.

Critics argue that policies allowing for the continued flow of migrants have contributed to the crisis, pointing to decisions that they believe encourage illegal immigration.

Supporters of the administration, however, emphasize the complexity of the issue, highlighting efforts to address the root causes of migration through diplomatic and aid initiatives aimed at improving conditions in home countries.

The political debate surrounding the border crisis is deeply polarized, with differing views on the best path forward.

Some advocate for stricter border controls and immigration policies to deter illegal crossings, while others call for comprehensive immigration reform that provides legal pathways for migrants and addresses the humanitarian aspects of the crisis.

Proposed policy solutions vary widely, from enhancing border security and streamlining the asylum process to increasing support for countries from which many migrants are fleeing.

The current administration has also sought to balance enforcement with measures aimed at humanitarian relief, though these efforts have faced challenges in implementation and criticism from various quarters.

It is my strong belief that the current administration has exacerbated this situation in several ways.  

One can draw a similar comparison between this and the issue of electric vs. gas powered vehicles and really energy in general. 

You never make an immediate leap into something without a short-term and long-term strategy.  In the example of electric vs. gas cars, you need gasoline powered cars and infrastructure to support the use of them for quite some time, even if the plan is to move to all electric vehicles. 

We need time to build out an electric infrastructure that will take at least a decade.  You need charging stations, more power for grid use, ways to recycle an influx of batteries, and you need enough resources to build so many electric cars.

We are simply not there yet.  Several states deal with power outages during winter and summer time due to grid use.

Potential Solutions and Outlook

Addressing the root causes of migration is essential to any long-term solution to the border crisis.

This includes international cooperation to improve economic stability, governance, and security in the countries most affected by migration flows.

Domestically, there is a call for immigration system reform that can efficiently process asylum claims, provide humanitarian support to migrants, and implement fair but effective border security measures.

The outlook for the border crisis depends on a range of factors, including political will, international collaboration, and the efficacy of policy measures aimed at addressing both the symptoms and root causes of migration.

As the situation evolves, the need for comprehensive and sustainable approaches to immigration and border management remains clear.

One thing is for sure.  The border must be secured.  We need to get the border wall completed ASAP.  We simply cannot afford to have millions of illegal immigrants flooding into our country unchecked. 

At the same time, we need to ramp up our efforts to expediting illegal immigrants into the country that can contribute in a meaningful way.

The need to have people with valuable skills continuously coming to our country will always remain, but we are also facing a shortage in people willing to do labor and service jobs. 

Conclusion

The current U.S. border crisis reflects broader, interconnected challenges facing our global community. While immediate actions are necessary to alleviate the humanitarian concerns at the border, long-term solutions require a commitment to addressing the root causes of migration and creating more equitable, stable conditions worldwide.

One thing is for sure.  America cannot continue to bear the responsibility and the financial burden of making all this happen, as we seem to always do. 

As the debate over border management and immigration policy continues, it is essential to treat this situation as one would triaging a patient in a hospital setting.

First thing is first – we need to stop the bleeding before it leads to the demise of our country. One can only hope that our leadership will change hands in 2024.

The Houthis + the Suez Canal.

The Red sea & the Suez Canal

Before we get into what everyone is reporting on, it’s important to understand what is happening from a geographic standpoint.

The Red Sea provides a very expedited route for goods traveling from Asia into Europe. Ships carrying goods can take up to 10 extra days to travel around the cape of good hope.

The Suez canal, along with the Panama canal provide immense savings in not only time, but cost (think fuel and wage costs), along with a faster delivery to buyers.

Why did this start in the first place?

The Houthis began these guerilla rocket and drone attacks in response to the Israel-Hamas war that occurred on October 7th.

Since then, they have attacked several commercial ships carrying goods with drones and ballistic missiles.

The Houthis have claimed that they are attacking all ships that are aiding/supplying Israel with goods. However, it is unclear that those facts are true at all. They seem to be targeting any ships they can.

In fact, when you look at the first week of January compared to January of last year there has been a 35% decrease in cargo transported through the Suez Canal.

In response to these attacks, major shipping companies such as Maersk have diverted their sea cargo through safer passage by other sea routes.

Who are the Houthis, and where did they come from?

The Houthis, officially known as Ansar Allah ( Supporters of God), are a group that sprouted up in the 1990’s in Yemen. They are predominately made up of Shia tribe, which is the 2nd largest branch of Islam.


Under the leadership of Hussein al-Houthi, the Houthis emerged as a dissident movement against Yemen’s President Ali Abdullah Saleh.

They accused Saleh of corruption and alleged support from Saudi Arabia and the United States. Inspired by Lebanon’s Shia political and military organization Hezbollah in 2003, the Houthis adopted an official slogan that opposed the United States, Israel, and the Jewish population.

Hussein al-Houthi was later killed by the Yemeni military in Saada in 2004, triggering the Houthi insurgency.

This came after he resisted Saleh’s orders for his arrest. Subsequently, the movement has primarily been led by his brother, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi.

As things currently stand, you can see the current map of Yemen below and where how is it controlled by different groups.

Due to the Houthi controlled territory on the Red Sea, there continues to be a constant threat toward any vessels that are going through the Suez Canal. 

A military spokesman claimed today that they would continue to attack whenever the following occurred, such as the “transit of Israeli ships or those carrying goods to the occupied Palestinian ports,” and said they would carry on at “whatever the cost.”

This statement was hours after the United States and the UK targeted Houthi weapons that were used in targeting vessels traveling along the Red Sea.

Source: CBS News

Houthi officials have strongly criticized the attack on their lands, describing it as unjustified and “barbaric.”

They have also issued threats of further targeting Israeli ships or vessels heading towards the occupied Palestinian territories.

The U.S. President, Joe Biden, announced these strikes late on Thursday, marking an escalation of tensions that have been simmering in the Middle East since the Hamas terror attacks against Israel on October 7 and the subsequent Israeli Defense Forces’ campaign in the Gaza Strip.

From what we can deduce, the Houthis will not stop their attacks until the siege of the Gaza strip is withdrawn and the Palestinian people are no longer at risk.

Biden Family Corruption

Devon Archer, a former business associate of Hunter Biden arriving for testimony.

Who is Devon Archer?

In his memoir, “Beautiful Things,” Hunter Biden called Archer a “self-made, super motivated former college lacrosse player with a disarming charm.”

Archer and Hunter Biden were business partners since 2009 when they co-founded the advisory firm Rosemont Seneca, and they later both landed seats on Burisma’s board in 2014.

Let’s take a look at some additional facts about Burisma:

  • The company’s founder, Mykola Zlochevsky, was a minister of ecology and natural resources in Ukraine from 2010 to 2012.
  • Burisma has been accused of corruption by Ukrainian prosecutors, but no charges have been filed.
  • The allegations against Burisma were a major factor in the impeachment of President Donald Trump in 2019.
  • We also know that Burisma paid Biden for services rendered. NBC News was first to report that an ex-business partner had warned Biden he should amend his tax returns to disclose $400,000 in income from the Ukrainian firm, Burisma.

What do we know about Devon Archer’s testimony?

Devon Archer told the House Oversight Committee recently that his former business partner, Hunter Biden, was selling the “illusion” of access to his father.

James Comer, who is the House Oversight Committee Chairman mentioned that House Republicans’ investigations into the Biden family’s business deals appear to be rising to the level of an impeachment inquiry.

“Why did Joe Biden lie to the American people about his family’s business dealings and his involvement?” Comer said in a statement. “It begs the question of what else he is hiding from the American people.”

Comer (R-Ky.) said that Archer’s testimony gave Republicans more reason to investigate whether foreign actors targeted the Biden’s and whether President Biden is compromised and corrupt.

Here are some facts that we know:

  • Devon Archer testified that the value of adding Hunter Biden to Burisma’s board was “the brand” and confirmed that then-Vice President Joe Biden was “the brand.”Archer confirmed Joe Biden was referred to as “my guy” by Hunter Biden.
  • Archer admitted that “Burisma would have gone out of business if ‘the brand’ had not been attached to it.”  He believes that Hunter Biden being on the board and the Biden brand contributed to Burisma’s longevity. People would have been intimidated to mess with Burisma legally because of the Biden brand.
  • Devon Archer testified that Hunter Biden put his father, Joe Biden on the speakerphone during business meetings over 20 times. Archer testified that Joe Biden was put on the phone to sell “the brand.” These phone calls include a dinner in Paris with a French energy company and in China with Jonathan Li, the CEO of BHR.
  • Archer confirmed Joe Biden was referred to as “my guy” by Hunter Biden.

There are also several key pieces of information that the Committee of Oversight has gathered. I won’t go into them all here, since the list is extensive but you can find them all HERE.

I did, however, want to highlight a few more key pieces of information that were found to be true. In the photo below you can see the flow of money from a Russian Oligarch named Yelena Baturina into the Biden Family + associates hands.

Worth noting: Wikipedia mentions that she “is an international billionaire businesswoman and a philanthropist of Russian origin.

According to the then US ambassador to Russia, John Beyrle, he had reported allegations that Baturina had links to major criminal groups such as the Solntsevskaya Bratva, which is an organized crime group in Russia.

The most recent report 87 page report from the committee of oversight described her involvement with Biden as “a financial relationship,” but declined to delve deeper into why the wire transfer was made.

Source: Committee on Oversight & Accountability.

At this point, The Committee has now identified over $20 million in payments from foreign sources to the Biden family and their business associates.

We also know that President Biden lied about his family’s business deals. The Committee has revealed millions of dollars have come into the Biden family’s bank accounts from foreign sources, including China, Romania, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine.

Some of these instances have been confirmed through bank records. For example, after a Chinese company wired Robinson Walker, LLC $3 million, the Biden family received approximately $1,065,692 over a three-month period in different bank accounts.

The question is, why did they make this so obvious? If you are going to be taking bribe money you would think it would be funneled through multiple shell companies or generic names at the very least in order to hide the money trail.

“Biden” and “JBBSR INC” are comical. JBBSR = James Biden | Biden Senior Inc

If I’m being completely honest, this family is even dumber than they look, OR they know they are untouchable, so they have nothing to hide.

There is a chance it is the latter…. or both.

Prediction: The Next Democratic Candidates.

With 2024 elections coming up just around the corner, one might wonder if Biden is mentally fit for another 4 years, let alone the rest of 2023.

Up to this point, the White house has been good to keep Biden out of the press and continuously gives him softball after softball in terms of white house briefings, press appearances, etc.

One has to wonder why they are working so hard to not only limit his appearances, but to control every narrative.

Joe Biden is clearly a puppet that is getting the strings pulled in every direction – Americans deserve better.

There is a good chance that the three main Democratic candidates are Biden, Kennedy, and Williamson. However, I am starting to think that Joe Biden doesn’t have a chance in hell for re-election.

To me, it’s clear that Joe Biden is not going to be selected for another term. Not only for his cognitive abilities, but his overall approval ratings.

It is my strong belief that RJK Jr. has a real shot and being the top democratic candidate for the 2024 elections.

Why is that? Is it because he is the best democratic candidate? Maybe… it’s not hard to do these days.

Here is why I believe he is the best:

  • He has the political chops from his family pedigree to back this up.
  • Following in Trump’s footsteps, in that he wants to drain the swamp to a certain degree.
  • Wants to get rid of the military complex that now spends up to 2 trillion dollars per year.
  • Going after big pharma when American’s trust in them is at an all-time low (smart).
  • Understands that we need to be fiscally conservative moving forward if we are going to save America as a country.
  • He is an experienced litigator and debater from his time as a environmental lawyer. This man is sharp and he does his research.

However, RFK Jr’s real advantage over others is his ability to market and promote himself effectively. He is a self-promoting machine. The best part – he is doing it all for free.

His best move has been going on highly trafficked podcasts to get his message out there. Podcasts such as the all in podcast and the Joe Rogan podcast have propelled his message to millions of listeners.

Last but not least, he is the esteemed author of The real Anthony Fauci that exposed the true fraud behind the vaccines.

What was once thought to be a conspiracy theory, turned out to be the cold hard truth. This has gained him millions of true fans and gives him a high degree of authority and trust.

The bottom line is that Kennedy really is the full package for the democratic nominee. He is going to be a strong candidate for republicans to go up against.